It’s time to join the China train

The world has been wowed with Chinese clubs offering double of the weekly wages in the English Premier League to read more.......
attract high profile players to the Chinese Super League. As expected, star players are looking that way. Nigerians couldn’t have imagined, years before now, that the captain of the Super Eagles will one day be playing in China, but financial fulfilment is critical in any profession and many of Mikel Obi’s peers are already there earning good money. Carlos Tevez who had an influential place in Manchester City and helped them to a glorious title, journeyed off to Shanghai Shenhua for £635,000 a week just as Oscar did to Shanghai SIPG for £400,000 alongside Ghana’s Asamoah Gyan for £227,000. Didier Drogba has been there and there was news in January that EPL’s poster boy and Manchester United’s all-time highest goal scorer, Wayne Rooney, has considered heading east. Though it may all have ended in speculation, it was estimated that he could have been placed on a whooping £1m a week. The rich Chinese club owners are not paying as much just to feed the fun of their fancy, neither was it for fun too that the Government of China itself bought about 13% shares into Manchester City to enable them understand the currency of the global football business. While the clubs provide rallying hubs and serve as huge public relations and tourism vehicles for their host communities, the leagues have now transformed into very strong economic factors not to be ignored by any serious nation. The evidence of this imperative cannot be over-emphasised. A 29.5% at £1 stake bought by Ken Bates from Brian Mears by which he took Chelsea to AIM Stock Exchange in 1996, attracted partnership interests which grew the club to attract Roman Abramovich’s buy with as much as £140m, including Bates’ holding for £30m and 50% of Chelsea village community stake while he also brought additional £80m to clear the club’s debts. Similarly, a 60% stake in Swansea City was sold for £110m to Steve Kaplan and Jason Levien of an American consortium, 49.9-% of Everton was bought by Iranian billionaire, Farhad Moshiri, for nearly as much, 70% of Crystal Palace went for £100m to Josh Harris and David Blitzer, while Aston Villa went for £76m to a Chinese businessman, Tony Xia. All these coming into the UK. Qatar’s Sheikh Mansor brought in £210m for Manchester City and the value of the club has increased about five times to about £900m. This is even paltry, compared to the benefit Manchester as a city derives from the relationship. The stadium is owned by the Manchester City Council and with its naming as Etihad Stadium, the club pays the council £3m a year while Etihad signed to pay sponsorship to the club for ten years. The council also approved land for the new building of the Etihad Campus and, in return, Etihad Airways signed to create a British hub at the Manchester City Airport. This is strategised to create more jobs and support the realization of the £600m Manchester Airport City project from which financial benefits also accrue to the club. It is needless to mention the £790m Manchester United takeover by which the Glazers have taken United through the Singaporean and New York Stock Exchange and attracted over 80 sponsorship and partnership titles. The club is now valued in excess of £2b and delivering enormous development values to the city of Manchester. These investments help to grow the circle of development by which the clubs are able to invest in stadium, facilities and talents, increase the quality, appeal and demand for their games, expand media, convert the mass interest and following to commercial success and sustainable growth, share equity with their community and investors and return to continue to upgrade on facilities, talents and delivery of game experience and satisfaction to both local and domestic fans. It’s a revolving chain. Consequently, besides income from transfers, the EPL appeal and value in TV broadcast receipts, merchandising, sponsorship, ticketing and other revenue streams continue to grow. External broadcast revenue raked in as much as £722m in as far back as the 2013/2014 season. This enabled the EPL to devote a whopping £225m as solidarity support for other junior leagues and social development, while the clubs undertook to re-invest £340m for further development of their youth teams, all to maintain the strong market position. Ernest & Young, in a 2014 study, revealed that the EPL, with a value of about £7b, delivered about £2.4b in taxes to the UK economy and provided about 103,000 full time jobs in the 2013/14 season and additional engagement of 546,000 youths in sundry projects and programmes. EPL’s gross value added to the UK GDP is about £3.4b These derivatives typically underscore the kind of relationship and benefits between the government, communities, clubs and investors in a professional football league setting, as is obtainable in varying degrees in the different leagues in Europe. Football is a fast growing catalyst for investment and multi-sector development and, interestingly, the Asians are know that their region represents a huge one-third of the EPL market even as the English seem to have conquered Africa and stretching towards the Americas. Having studied these dimensions of the global football economy, the Chinese Central Football Authority decided that the Chinese Super League must go fully professional in January 2017, the Chinese League One (CL1), the equivalent of Nigeria’s National League, in March, while the CL2 is billed to join the system in 2019. The reform entails the establishment of new regulations and structures aimed at promoting “high quality and high-level competition, introducing advanced managerial concepts to the market, enforcing minimum standards of professionalism, encouraging the influx of more high profile foreign coaches and players, and gradually establishing the European system for players registration and transfers.” In summary, the reform is to restructure the Chinese football leagues as private and investor-friendly companies for commercial success. Worried that their league does not have a major international profile outside the region, Saudi Arabia has also responded with an approval by the government and appointment of a top notch investment management agency, Jadwa, to privatize many of its 14 mostly government-owned clubs. The reform, being driven by the nation’s Deputy Crown Prince, Mohammed bin Salman, and overseen by the Saudi Council of Economic and Development Affairs, aims at turning the government-owned clubs into private companies as part of strategic economic re-tooling “to reduce reliance of various sectors of its social economy on government oil revenue, ease the financial burden on the government and diversify the economy” from earnings from petroleum. While they are targeting individual billionaires and multi-millionaires, in the first instance, Saudi Arabia’s ultimate goal is to elicit foreign direct investments from global football investment and brands portfolios to elicit an inflow for domestic development. Their projection includes generating about 40,000 new jobs, especially for their citizens, and the Economic and Development Council has assured it will provide loans and other support to the clubs to stand on their own. The critical lesson here is in seeing that as economically well off than Nigeria as they are, China and Saudi Arabia acknowledge and are responding to the imperative of repositioning their clubs as investor-friendly business entities tap into the global offerings of football. The situation in Nigeria is so different as, expect for MFM, Remo Stars and FC IfeanyiUbah, the rest of the Nigeria Professional Football League (NPFL) teams are owned and financed by state governments, which in themselves rely on federal revenue allocations that accrue from oil exports. While virtually all the states have a yawning deficit in various infrastructure and with the oil revenue allocation unable to support the competing developmental needs, the glut in international oil price has worsened the situation with state governments unable to pay their wage bills, not to talk of embarking on capital development projects to revamp critical sectors like education, health, power, housing and roads. Comparatively, with a GDP of about $776bn, among the world’s top ten, the Saudis, who have decided to remove football from the bill of the state, is far richer than Nigeria. They host 18% of the world’s oil reserve, ranking second with about 268 billion barrels, as against Nigeria’s 40 billion which places it sixth. They have the world’s highest production capacity, averaging about 9 million barrels per day as against Nigeria’s 2.7 million at best. They top the world’s oil export index with about $133billion per annum while Nigeria grosses just about $40 billion at the peak of production. It therefore remains curious that Nigerian state governments, even in their incapacity, insist on funding professional football, contrary to the practice in the leagues that exemplify professionalism and success of the business.